— Interview
Uncorking the Possibilities
Thanks to years-long work with the material, product designer Daniel Michalik has become a leading advocate for cork.
I came across some cork that a manufacturer was trying to get rid of, so I found myself with three valuable things: a large amount of material; my school’s well-equipped studio space; and the time to focus on work from a speculative perspective. I discovered that cork does things that no other material can quite do. It bends and flexes and compresses. There was also the psychological aspect of it. People had an emotional response to an object, because we have a collective understanding of cork, but they saw it used in a way they never experienced. I had the opportunity to change the context around objects, which gave me the inspiration to keep going.
At the time, mass manufacturers had not experimented with cork, so I quickly learned how to design things that were unique to cork as a material, and which I could manufacture in my own studio or with close collaborators nearby.
I first got involved with cork in the mid-2000s, about six to eight years after screw caps and plastic stoppers had really hit the market and undercut the natural cork industry. In the past 10 years, natural cork has rebounded to a pre-screwcaps level, because the industry has leaned into the ecologically regenerative nature of the material and eliminated the spoilage effect that natural cork could sometimes have on wine. All that said, the production of cork wine stoppers is inextricably linked to the cork I use, which is waste material from the production of those stoppers. If we can promote the production of natural cork stoppers, we increase the supply of cork building materials, thereby lowering their cost. All these market forces are interlinked.
The forest can only produce so much material, and no cork grower wants to overstress the trees. They have to stick to a very strict harvesting schedule, and they have to hire skilled and well-paid people to harvest the trees. Yet people who see cork as an exciting new material in architecture and interiors want to bring the cost down, and one way to do so is to increase the supply.
I collaborate with a lot of industrial partners in Portugal and Spain, and with design firms that are interested in using cork on much larger-scale projects. I’m also working on a strategic project about increasing the supply of natural cork on the world market while also healing the natural systems that support cork trees: the more I learn about the agricultural systems of cork, the more I realize we can be planting cork forests throughout the world — and that natural systems will benefit as a result.
I would say that a thriving, working cork forest has four positive characteristics, ecologically speaking. One is the carbon sequestration. These forests are sinking carbon from our atmosphere. The second has to do with the complexity of the root systems within the cork forests, which help to protect soil structure. Three is that, within a thriving forest, you have thriving biodiversity. And number four, cork trees are naturally fire-resistant. I imagine planting cork forests in central California.
The other opportunity concerns reclaiming used cork stoppers. Cork is almost infinitely recyclable, and you can recycle cork stoppers into building materials. Currently, there is not a robust infrastructure for collection, nor a system for reusing those cork stoppers. We need to build networks of collection facilities and processing points.
People who work with land look for the quickest and biggest return on investment. It’s a major threat, because in cork regions where tourism is surging, like Portugal, building a luxury development that depletes the water table and damages forests offers quicker, bigger returns than stewarding a cork forest. I can’t blame a landowner for wanting a return on investment, but the more that we can communicate the opportunities of cork, the more we can fight against threats.
I came across some cork that a manufacturer was trying to get rid of, so I found myself with three valuable things: a large amount of material; my school’s well-equipped studio space; and the time to focus on work from a speculative perspective. I discovered that cork does things that no other material can quite do. It bends and flexes and compresses. There was also the psychological aspect of it. People had an emotional response to an object, because we have a collective understanding of cork, but they saw it used in a way they never experienced. I had the opportunity to change the context around objects, which gave me the inspiration to keep going.
At the time, mass manufacturers had not experimented with cork, so I quickly learned how to design things that were unique to cork as a material, and which I could manufacture in my own studio or with close collaborators nearby.
I first got involved with cork in the mid-2000s, about six to eight years after screw caps and plastic stoppers had really hit the market and undercut the natural cork industry. In the past 10 years, natural cork has rebounded to a pre-screwcaps level, because the industry has leaned into the ecologically regenerative nature of the material and eliminated the spoilage effect that natural cork could sometimes have on wine. All that said, the production of cork wine stoppers is inextricably linked to the cork I use, which is waste material from the production of those stoppers. If we can promote the production of natural cork stoppers, we increase the supply of cork building materials, thereby lowering their cost. All these market forces are interlinked.
The forest can only produce so much material, and no cork grower wants to overstress the trees. They have to stick to a very strict harvesting schedule, and they have to hire skilled and well-paid people to harvest the trees. Yet people who see cork as an exciting new material in architecture and interiors want to bring the cost down, and one way to do so is to increase the supply.
I collaborate with a lot of industrial partners in Portugal and Spain, and with design firms that are interested in using cork on much larger-scale projects. I’m also working on a strategic project about increasing the supply of natural cork on the world market while also healing the natural systems that support cork trees: the more I learn about the agricultural systems of cork, the more I realize we can be planting cork forests throughout the world — and that natural systems will benefit as a result.
I would say that a thriving, working cork forest has four positive characteristics, ecologically speaking. One is the carbon sequestration. These forests are sinking carbon from our atmosphere. The second has to do with the complexity of the root systems within the cork forests, which help to protect soil structure. Three is that, within a thriving forest, you have thriving biodiversity. And number four, cork trees are naturally fire-resistant. I imagine planting cork forests in central California.
The other opportunity concerns reclaiming used cork stoppers. Cork is almost infinitely recyclable, and you can recycle cork stoppers into building materials. Currently, there is not a robust infrastructure for collection, nor a system for reusing those cork stoppers. We need to build networks of collection facilities and processing points.
People who work with land look for the quickest and biggest return on investment. It’s a major threat, because in cork regions where tourism is surging, like Portugal, building a luxury development that depletes the water table and damages forests offers quicker, bigger returns than stewarding a cork forest. I can’t blame a landowner for wanting a return on investment, but the more that we can communicate the opportunities of cork, the more we can fight against threats.